Wine Industry News

Napa County Okays Wineries to Reopen to Public

Napa County has given the county’s wineries the green light to reopen their tasting rooms to the public, a county spokesperson confirmed late Friday afternoon.The announcement comes after weeks of anticipation on the part of the county’s wineries, which have been shuttered for on-premise wine tastings since March 15.“The impact of the COVID-19 crisis has been devastating for all businesses, and especially for the small businesses which make up the vast majority of wineries in Napa Valley,” Napa Valley Vintner President and CEO Linda Reiff said in a written statement Friday. Reopening tasting rooms would “provide much-needed jobs” for community members, she added.Wineries are now permitted to reopen at their discretion, Napa County spokesperson Elizabeth Scott said. Mark Ghaly, the state’s top health official, signaled earlier Friday the state’s intentions to release guidance for reopening sectors of the economy that had so far remained closed. At the state level, those businesses included hotels, gyms, museums and professional sports (played without an audience).It falls to individual counties to decide whether to proceed with reopening. Though it’s been given the green light, the county has decided not to move forward with opening gyms at this time, Scott said.Napa County Public Health Officer Karen Relucio, after considering “local conditions and disease epidemiology,” found that it would be “prudent to now allow wineries to reopen,” Scott said. The timeline and regulations around reopening the state’s wineries was to be based in science and data, according to Senator Bill Dodd, whose district encompasses all of Napa County with the exception of Calistoga as well as portions of southeast Sonoma County. Wineries in Sonoma County were allowed to reopen for outdoor service in late May, so long as they served food with their wines. Napa County’s wineries, the vast majority of which are barred from serving food by the Winery Definition Ordinance, could not follow suit. Dodd found that discrepancy, which last week sparked a lawsuit against Gov. Newsom from Caymus Vineyards, troubling, he said, but acknowledged that the reopening process would have to be “a balancing act.”“Our Governor is trying to be conservative because the last thing he wants is another shutdown of the economy,” Dodd said. “But I do think based on the number of infections we have and where they are that we’re ready to open with appropriate mitigation in place; it won’t be business as usual.”

At the minimum, Dodd said, visitors to wineries will be asked to socially distance and wear masks on the premises. Wineries have expressed intentions to limit touch points between staff and guests as well as emphasize open-air tastings. Dodd has heard from constituents concerned that reopening the county’s wineries would bring in tourists from other, harder-hit counties in the Bay Area. It’s a rational worry, he said, but voiced his confidence in the ability of both businesses and their customers to protect themselves and the community.The Napa Valley Vintners, which represents 550 wineries through the Napa Valley, were “instrumental” in the creation of the guidelines, Dodd said. The group has issued safety protocols for customers and employees to its membership and beyond, and has recommended wineries take additional steps to ensure social distancing, like moving to an appointment-only system.Napa’s wine industry would bring its “spirit of excellence” into ensuring the safety of guests and employees, Reiff said.State and federal officials will be in constant contact with officials at the local level to ensure the situation on the ground remains stable, Dodd said. If consumers and community members stop social distancing or fail to promote exceptional standards of personal hygiene, the chances of returning to a shutdown “are far greater in the fall and toward the end of the year,” he added.

He emphasized that both community members and visitors to the Napa Valley should closely observe recommended safety protocols.

“If you’re going to come to Napa, obey the rules,” Dodd said. “Every place you go, whether it’s a winery or a hotel or a restaurant, is going to have rules and regulations. Please, on behalf of our community, don’t blow them off.”

State officials are expected to issue a press release regarding the openings, Scott said. Standards and guidance for different industries can be found at the county’s website, as can best management practices prepared by local Chambers of Commerce. Businesses reopening must post the state’s checklist and prepare social distancing protocol as required by the state’s shelter at home order, the county has said.

You can reach Sarah Klearman at (707) 256-2213 or sklearman@napanews.com.

Source: Napa Valley Register

Premiere Napa Valley Raises $3.9 Million

“Bids at Premiere Napa Valley this Saturday raised more than $3.9 million, according to a press release from the Napa Valley Vintners (NVV).

The group holds the annual event in support of their work to “promote, protect and enhance the Napa Valley,” according to NVV.

This year’s auction featured 201 lots, bidding on which lasted almost four hours. The night’s highest bid was placed on a five-case (60 bottle) lot of 2018 Cabernet Sauvignon from Rudd Estate, a whopping $2,000 per bottle. The bid, from Swedish buyer Gregor Greber, was said to be a tribute to Leslie Rudd, a storied vintner and entrepreneur for whom Rudd Estate was a central focus of his sprawling portfolio of investments in Napa Valley. Rudd died in the spring of 2018.

A 20-case (240 bottle) lot of red wine from Darioush received the second-highest bid of the night at $115,000. Also notable was a five-case lot of Cabernet Sauvignon from Shafer Vineyards, which, at $85,000, was seen as a tribute to John Shafer, a philanthropist, vintner and a central figure of Napa’s wine industry who died last March at the age of 94.

Premiere Napa Valley in past years has raised as much as $6 million through the course of a single auction, as it did in 2015, when it set its fundraising record. The invitation-only event regularly draws prestigious winemakers, wine critics and wine buyers, some of whom come from overseas to attend.”

Sarah Klearman, Napa Valley Register

“For more information about the release of Premiere Napa Valley 2020 wines and to view and download images visit premierenapavalley.com. Highlights from the week can be found on social media with the hashtag #PNV20.

About the Napa Valley Vintners

The Napa Valley Vintners nonprofit trade association has been cultivating excellence since 1944 by inspiring its 550 members to consistently produce wines of the highest quality, to provide environmental leadership and to care for the extraordinary place they call home. Learn more at napavintners.com

Contact: Tia Butts, Media Contractor - 707.260.5620, tbutts@napavintners.com

A Lineup of Napa Wine Country Controversies are Coming Back for Hearings

“Several Napa County wine country growth controversies are getting second lives, starting with the recently approved Hard Six Cellars winery along Diamond Mountain Road near Calistoga.

The county Planning Commission heard these cases and rendered decisions. Opponents to the outcomes have filed appeals with the Board of Supervisors.

Hard Six Cellars is an example of a proposed winery that some rural neighbors say is too ambitious for a remote, mountainous location. The Board of Supervisors is to hear the appeal at 9:30 am. Tuesday at the county administration building, 1195 Third St. in Napa.

The Planning Commission approved the winery in October. Appellants Martin Checov and Timothy Bause in the appeal say the project “must now be sent back to the drawing board.”

Among other things, they claim Diamond Mountain Road – “a dilapidated mountain road that is frequently strewn with forest debris” – is unsuitable for the amount of car, bus and truck trips to be generated by the winery. They note that Diamond Mountain is considered by Cal Fire to be at high risk for wildfires.

A county report responds that the Planning Commission didn’t ignore Diamond Mountain conditions. Commissioners considered the opinions of licensed traffic professional and fire officials.

County staff recommends denial of the appeal, which would result in approval of the winery. The Board of Supervisors will make the call.

Meanwhile, other appeals loom. They include:

Bremer Family Winery – This is only the latest controversy involving the Bremer winery near Deer Park in the mountains northeast of St. Helena.

The county sued the winery in 2017 over numerous alleged code violations. A 2019 settlement among other things directed the Bremers to try to legalize footbridges and other structures along a stream – some built prior to their ownership – before the Planning Commission.

In October, the Planning Commission approved the structures within a stream setback by a 3-2 vote. Angwin resident Mike Hackett and Advocates for the Public Trust filed an appeal.

“They are using public trust space to sell wine,” Hackett told the Planning Commission in October. “Are we going to penalize them or are we going to reward them? I think it’s very important you set a precedent for future violators.”

A Planning Commission majority didn’t want the Bremers to have to remove the structures. However, Commissioner Joelle Gallagher expressed concerned that the Bremers’ request was entangled with the lawsuit settlement that didn’t contemplate Planning Commission denial.

Hackett in the appeal writes that the Board of Supervisors cannot hear the appeal due to a conflict of interest, given the county entered into the settlement agreement. He is asking the Board of Supervisors to recuse itself.

The appeal was to be discussed by the Board of Supervisors last Tuesday. The Board continued the matter until March 17.

Mathew Bruno Tasting Room – This project approved by the Planning Commission in December involves turning an 1890s-era Victorian home in Rutherford into a tasting room.

“We knew this would be a great place for a family to enjoy our wines in a setting in Rutherford,” Anthony Bruno told the commission.

The home is at the entrance to Grape Lane, a narrow, private road serving several homes. The Grape Lane Association has traffic concerns, among them plans for tasting room parking stalls next to their access road.

Planning commissioners decided the applicants were doing enough to meet the neighborhood concerns. The Grape Lane Association disagreed.

Attorney Tom Carey wrote the appeal on behalf of the association. Among other things, he pointed to changes made by the Planning Commission at the meeting to try to address concerns.

“Because these revisions were made at the same hearing at which the project was approved, the neighbors not present at the hearing had no prior notice of these changes,” Carey wrote.

Mountain Peak Winery – This is another case raising questions of how big a winery should be allowed in the mountains along a narrow road.

The Board of Supervisors heard an appeal in May 2017 and approved this winery to be built at the end of Soda Canyon Road. But supervisors may have more work to do.

Opponents brought the case to Napa County Superior Court. The court last summer ruled the Board of Supervisors should reconsider the issue based on new information on safety in light of the October 2017 Atlas fire that burned much of Soda Canyon.

Project proponents have challenged this ruling in the state 1st District Court of Appeal.

Walt Ranch – This controversial project involves planting vineyards in the mountains between the city of Napa and Lake Berryessa.

The Board of Supervisors in 2016 approved the project, leading to a court challenge by opponents. An issue has arisen over greenhouse gas mitigation.

Walt Ranch intends to mitigate for the loss of 14,000 carbon-sequestering trees by preserving woodlands. The 1st District Court of Appeal in October questioned whether the woodlands to be preserved are in danger of being cut down.

How and when this issue will be resolved remains to be seen.”

By: BARRY EBERLING beberling@napanews.com